Comparison
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Mythos 5
OpenAI's launch chart puts its new flagship, Sol, ahead of Claude's Mythos 5 and Fable 5. It's a useful headline — but the numbers are OpenAI's own, and the gap is narrower than the top line suggests. The practical twist: both sides are now runnable — Fable 5 is back (in-plan on Max and Team Premium, credits on Pro), and GPT-5.6 went public July 9. Here's the honest read.
Quick summary
- On OpenAI's Terminal-Bench chart, Sol Ultra leads clearly; standard Sol and Mythos 5 are essentially tied; Fable 5 sits a notch below.
- All four model numbers are OpenAI-reported — independent leaderboards don't yet list them.
- The timing matters: GPT-5.6 went public July 9 at half Fable 5's token price — three days before Fable 5's plan window was due to close (since extended to July 19).
The chart everyone's sharing
OpenAI's announcement leads with Terminal-Bench 2.1, an agentic-coding benchmark. Here are the scores from that chart:
Higher is better, out of 100. OpenAI-reported figures.
Source: OpenAI's launch chart (self-reported). Independent leaderboards don't yet list these models; only Gemini 3.1 Pro's 70.7 is independently verified, and it isn't part of OpenAI's comparison set.
Read it honestly: Sol Ultra's lead is real on this chart, but ultra is a multi-agent mode that spends far more compute. Standard Sol (88.8) and Mythos 5 (88.0) are within a point. Fable 5 at 84.3 trails by a few points — not a generation.
Why to treat the numbers carefully
Every OpenAI and Anthropic score above comes from OpenAI's own launch chart, not an independent test. The public Terminal-Bench leaderboards don't yet list any of these models, and their current top independently-measured score sits well below Sol's claimed 91.9. Only Gemini 3.1 Pro's 70.7 is independently verified — and it isn't part of OpenAI's comparison set.
There's also no published GPT-5.6 score on cybersecurity's ExploitBench — OpenAI only claims Sol is competitive with Mythos while using about a third of the tokens. Treat all of this as vendor framing until independent results land.
The access flip: Fable 5 is back, GPT-5.6 isn't
The benchmark is a paper race, but access isn't. Fable 5 is back worldwide as of July 1 — you can run it inside Claude, Claude Code, and Cowork (in-plan on Max and Team Premium, on metered usage credits for Pro). GPT-5.6's ~20-partner gate lifted on July 9 — the chart question is now testable on your own work. With Sol at a confirmed $5/$30 versus Fable 5's $10/$50, the cost side of the comparison is not close. Run both before Fable 5's plan window closes July 19.
- GPT-5.6: who can use it and when Access, tiers, pricing, and the controversy
- What Fable 5 costs now the credits math and decision rules
Need the short answer?
Fable 5 is back worldwide as of July 1 — in-plan on Max and Team Premium, on usage credits for Pro. See the live status, or use GLM-5.2 or the new Sonnet 5 for cheaper work.
Read the brief Fabel 5 spelling guideFAQ
Is GPT-5.6 Sol better than Fable 5?
On OpenAI's own Terminal-Bench chart, yes — Sol 88.8 and Sol Ultra 91.9 versus Fable 5's 84.3. But those are OpenAI-reported numbers, not independent, and standard Sol is within about a point of Claude's Mythos 5.
Where is Terra in the comparison?
Terra isn't on this benchmark chart. OpenAI positions Terra as a balanced tier roughly matching GPT-5.5 at about half the cost, not as a Sol- or Mythos-class competitor.
Can I run either model right now?
Fable 5 yes, GPT-5.6 mostly no. Fable 5 is back (July 1) inside Claude; GPT-5.6 is still restricted to about 20 government-approved partners via API and Codex.
From the Field Guide
Stop guessing which model to use
Weekly verified workflows for the credits era: which model in which seat, what it costs per task, and copy-ready prompts — plus an 8-runbook Starter Pack you can download once and keep. Every claim checked against published pricing, sources shown.
Get the free weekly briefing
One practical email a week: what's worth running on Fable 5, what it costs, and which jobs belong on a cheaper model — plus one email when the next big move lands. No spam, leave anytime.
Sources
This page is independent. Official provider pages are the source of record for access, pricing, and policy.