Comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Mythos 5

OpenAI's launch chart puts its new flagship, Sol, ahead of Claude's Mythos 5 and Fable 5. It's a useful headline — but the numbers are OpenAI's own, and the gap is narrower than the top line suggests. The practical twist: both sides are now runnable — Fable 5 is back (in-plan on Max and Team Premium, credits on Pro), and GPT-5.6 went public July 9. Here's the honest read.

Quick summary

  • On OpenAI's Terminal-Bench chart, Sol Ultra leads clearly; standard Sol and Mythos 5 are essentially tied; Fable 5 sits a notch below.
  • All four model numbers are OpenAI-reported — independent leaderboards don't yet list them.
  • The timing matters: GPT-5.6 went public July 9 at half Fable 5's token price — three days before Fable 5's plan window was due to close (since extended to July 19).
BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 2.1
NumbersOpenAI-reported
Runnable todayFable 5 yes, GPT-5.6 no

The chart everyone's sharing

OpenAI's announcement leads with Terminal-Bench 2.1, an agentic-coding benchmark. Here are the scores from that chart:

Terminal-Bench 2.1 — agentic coding

Higher is better, out of 100. OpenAI-reported figures.

Sol Ultra91.9
Sol88.8
Mythos 588.0
Fable 5 · back84.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro70.7
GPT-5.6 (OpenAI) Claude (Anthropic) Other

Source: OpenAI's launch chart (self-reported). Independent leaderboards don't yet list these models; only Gemini 3.1 Pro's 70.7 is independently verified, and it isn't part of OpenAI's comparison set.

Read it honestly: Sol Ultra's lead is real on this chart, but ultra is a multi-agent mode that spends far more compute. Standard Sol (88.8) and Mythos 5 (88.0) are within a point. Fable 5 at 84.3 trails by a few points — not a generation.

Why to treat the numbers carefully

Every OpenAI and Anthropic score above comes from OpenAI's own launch chart, not an independent test. The public Terminal-Bench leaderboards don't yet list any of these models, and their current top independently-measured score sits well below Sol's claimed 91.9. Only Gemini 3.1 Pro's 70.7 is independently verified — and it isn't part of OpenAI's comparison set.

There's also no published GPT-5.6 score on cybersecurity's ExploitBench — OpenAI only claims Sol is competitive with Mythos while using about a third of the tokens. Treat all of this as vendor framing until independent results land.

The access flip: Fable 5 is back, GPT-5.6 isn't

The benchmark is a paper race, but access isn't. Fable 5 is back worldwide as of July 1 — you can run it inside Claude, Claude Code, and Cowork (in-plan on Max and Team Premium, on metered usage credits for Pro). GPT-5.6's ~20-partner gate lifted on July 9 — the chart question is now testable on your own work. With Sol at a confirmed $5/$30 versus Fable 5's $10/$50, the cost side of the comparison is not close. Run both before Fable 5's plan window closes July 19.

Need the short answer?

Fable 5 is back worldwide as of July 1 — in-plan on Max and Team Premium, on usage credits for Pro. See the live status, or use GLM-5.2 or the new Sonnet 5 for cheaper work.

Read the brief Fabel 5 spelling guide

FAQ

Is GPT-5.6 Sol better than Fable 5?

On OpenAI's own Terminal-Bench chart, yes — Sol 88.8 and Sol Ultra 91.9 versus Fable 5's 84.3. But those are OpenAI-reported numbers, not independent, and standard Sol is within about a point of Claude's Mythos 5.

Where is Terra in the comparison?

Terra isn't on this benchmark chart. OpenAI positions Terra as a balanced tier roughly matching GPT-5.5 at about half the cost, not as a Sol- or Mythos-class competitor.

Can I run either model right now?

Fable 5 yes, GPT-5.6 mostly no. Fable 5 is back (July 1) inside Claude; GPT-5.6 is still restricted to about 20 government-approved partners via API and Codex.

From the Field Guide

Stop guessing which model to use

Weekly verified workflows for the credits era: which model in which seat, what it costs per task, and copy-ready prompts — plus an 8-runbook Starter Pack you can download once and keep. Every claim checked against published pricing, sources shown.

Read the free sample issue See plans — $12/mo · $29 one-time

Related

Sources

This page is independent. Official provider pages are the source of record for access, pricing, and policy.

Opus 5 just reset the math — half price, on your plan. One free email on what actually changed.